Meet Jackie Hutter

🎯 Can you actually design a patent application to be GRANTED — on time, on budget, and broad enough to protect what makes you money? You can. But first you have to reject the two most maddening words in my profession: "it depends." 😤
Ask a patent attorney a straight question and you'll usually hear "well… it depends." But whether your innovation gets strong patent protection doesn't have to depend. Done right — strategically — you can formulate applications with a high likelihood of being granted. In this episode I show you exactly how. 🧭
I'm Jackie Hutter, and after 30+ years as a patent strategist, this is the framework I use with clients to design applications for allowance. ⚖️
🔑 The 4 steps you'll learn:

1️⃣ Start with a validated customer — and capture the FULL scope of value, not just your first sale 💰

2️⃣ Define your invention by difference — my "Sesame Street" approach to the prior art 🧠

3️⃣ Give the examiner a roadmap to YES — non-limiting backup claims that skip the expensive fight 🛣️

4️⃣ Tell a story — examiners are people, and the business (not just the lawyer) owns that story 📖
💡 Plus: why long claims aren't always narrow claims, a real startup example (measuring methane on a farm 🐄), and how AI + expert prompting is putting sophisticated patent strategy within reach of modestly resourced companies. 🤖
🚦 Proper planning prevents poor patent performance. Your patent doesn't have to depend — when it's done right, success can be designed. ✅
⏱️ Chapters:

00:00 The "it depends" problem

01:21 A patent that issues is no accident

03:59 Step 1 — Start with the customer

07:04 Innovation vs. invention

09:39 Step 2 — Define by difference

13:26 The non-limiting limitation

15:52 Step 3 — A roadmap for the examiner

17:56 Step 4 — Tell a story

21:48 What AI changes

23:53 Recap + the one question to ask your patent team
📣 If this helped, subscribe for founder-focused patent strategy — and share it with someone about to spend real money on a patent. They'll thank you. 🙏

💬 Got a patent question? Connect with me on LinkedIn — I answer fastest there: 👉 https://www.linkedin.com/in/jackiehutter/

🔗 More at thehuttergroup.com
⚠️ For educational purposes only — not legal advice.
#Patents #PatentStrategy #IPStrategy #AIPatent #IntellectualProperty #PatentLaw #IP #IPLaw #USPTO #Innovation #StartupFounders #Entrepreneurship #Inventor #PatentPortfolio #WinningWithPatents

0 0

‼️As a patent strategist who works exclusively with startup companies, I don’t care what my startup clients invented. Full stop.

🤦‍♀️And if you’re a startup founder, this probably runs directly against the question your patent lawyer usually asks you from the get go:

🫵“What did you invent?”

🤔It sounds logical if only because patents are supposed to protect "inventions."

🎢It’s also where most startup patent strategies inadvertently go off track.

🧑‍🦯‍➡️Because the "what did you invent?" inquiry assumes something most startups don’t actually have yet: clarity on what will drive value in the business.

⛔And here’s the part that founders likely don't realize–your patent attorney may not know the difference between what a startup needs… and what an established company needs.

🙂‍↔️They’re not doing anything wrong. They’re doing what they’ve been trained to do. But that training is largely built around companies that already know

☑️what customers will buy
☑️where revenue comes from
🎯what needs to be protected to cover the customers and revenue

🔀Startups are in a completely different position.

🔭They're still figuring out how to position their tech or products so that customers will buy from them at scale. And, if they haven't yet pivoted, they will–likely multiple times.

😭Which means if startup founder default to the same patenting approach used for established companies, they can end up protecting what they’ve already built in the past…instead of what will drive scalable revenue streams in the future.

🧐I see this play out all the time.

🔬The issue isn’t patent quality. It’s strategic focus.

🥂And this gap typically doesn’t show up until it may be too late: after the startup has customer validation and growing revenue. That is, when the business evolves into a success.

😞Unfortunately, this success may be short-lived if the startup's patent strategy was not solidly constructed.

👂Hear this: If you’re a startup founder building in an environment where your product, your customer, and even your business model may change, your patent strategy has to reflect that reality.

🛑Otherwise, you may end up very well protected… but for the wrong product. Importantly, a broad patent that covers the wrong product is worthless to the startup because it protects something that no one likely wants to buy.

📽️In this new video in my Winning with Patents Youtube channel, I show startup founders how to shift how they think about patent strategy. Give it a watch: https://lnkd.in/dh88XMAu

#startups #patents #ipstrategy #patentstrategy #founders #innovation #winningwithpatents

#Startups #PatentStrategy #IntellectualProperty #Founders #StartupAdvice #VentureCapital #Innovation #TechStartups #ProductMarketFit #Entrepreneurship #IPStrategy #Patents #BusinessStrategy #AIStartups #meddevice

4 0

The Big Mistake Startup Founders Can Make on Day 1 — And How to Avoid It

🚨 The most dangerous startup mistake doesn’t start with bad technology or poorly crafted product development.

⚖️ It starts with unclear ownership for the startup's intellectual property. And, notwithstanding the problems it can make for startups, I see this time and time again.

❓How does the Startup IP Ownership Trap occur? It’s pretty easy to predict, actually.

🚀 At the beginning of a startup journey, founders like you move fast. You brainstorm. You whiteboard. You build. You collaborate. But in the typical situation, no one stops to define who actually owns the intellectual property being created. This is not surprising because who wants to stop and spend money on lawyers when you are sprinting toward delivering a really cool technology or product to people who will pay you?!

⚠️ That decision — or lack of decision — to address IP ownership at the initial stages of your startup journey can follow your company for years. In fact, the decisions you make — or actually don’t make — at the beginning can destroy your ability to attract investment or make it impossible for your startup to achieve a strong exit.

🔍 In this video, I break down:

• Why early-stage collaboration quietly creates ownership risk
• How patent law treats inventorship and co-ownership
• Why joint patent ownership can destroy exclusivity
• What investors look for during IP due diligence
• And the simple steps founders can take to avoid disaster

🧠 You do not need expensive legal perfection at the earliest stage.

✅ But you do need ownership clarity.

⏳ Because intellectual property rights are created the moment innovation is created — not when you incorporate, not when you file a patent, and not when you raise capital.

📈 If you’re building something that could scale, this is a conversation you need to have now — not later.

🛡️ Build fast. But build protected.

🎯 Subscribe to Winning With Patents for practical, founder-focused IP strategy that helps you build real enterprise value.

#StartupFounder
#Patents
#IntellectualProperty
#IPStrategy
#PatentStrategy
#Startups
#FounderMistakes
#DueDiligence
#WinningWithPatents

1 0